Census Outputs for Scotland


Forum » Blog / Archive from pilot website » Census Outputs for Scotland
Started by: ONS_BrendanONS_Brendan
On: 1227881419|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Number of posts: 2
rss icon RSS: New posts
Summary:
Originally posted 25/07/2008 by Angele (ONS)
Census Outputs for Scotland
ONS_BrendanONS_Brendan 1227881419|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

We, at GROS, are keen to get feedback from users on any issues focussed specifically on census outputs for Scotland. While the recent online survey included some questions relating to each individual country in the UK, we would like to use this blog posting to provide users with the opportunity to expand on any particular Scottish issues. For example, we would like to know what you think went well and not so well with the 2001 Census outputs issued by GROS? What would be your top priorities for improvements to Scottish census outputs come 2011? Any thoughts on how Scottish census outputs should best interface with other data such as Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics (SNS)? - e.g. a consolidated single source of census and non-census data, or building in better links between the SNS, Scottish Government and other official statistics websites, and a 'son of SCROL'? Any other suggestions for improved or alternative ways of accessing Scottish census data?

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Census Outputs for Scotland by ONS_BrendanONS_Brendan, 1227881419|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Census Outputs for Scotland (Originally posted 04/08/2008 by Richard Price)
ONS_BrendanONS_Brendan 1227881465|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

For myself the great thing about GROS' output was that the counts were additive across all of the geographies (migration excepted).

The biggest issue was the lack of a proper CSV formatted file. ONS were able to commission a programmer to output their data in a sensible format. Unfortunately GROS were using a different version of Scrol and so were unable to make use of this. The Scottish CSV file was provided with all the geographies mixed together and was a nightmare to sort out.

Next time it would be sensible for all three census agencies to fully test the outputs with their users to ensure that this does not happen again. This issue became apparent at a very late stage which mean that remedial action became rushed or in GROS case impossible.

Reply  |  Options
New Post
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License