<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;Comparing 2001 and 2011 data - Use scenarios&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-166595/comparing-2001-and-2011-data-use-scenarios</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Comparing 2001 and 2011 data - Use scenarios&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-166595#post-526930</guid>
				<title>Yes please</title>
				<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-166595/comparing-2001-and-2011-data-use-scenarios#post-526930</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Richard Price</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>255467</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I think in general at sometime or other all of these will be needed.</p> <p>The only extra I can think of is similar comparisons and metadata for geographic changes. As OA's are not constant, i.e. some will be split or merged (&lt; 5%) information to identify these will be required. Indeed being able to select these, may even be required as they will potentially be the areas of greatest change.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>