<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;Online output questionnaire results IV: 2011 / 2001 data comparisons&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140/online-output-questionnaire-results-iv:2011-2001-data-comparisons</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Online output questionnaire results IV: 2011 / 2001 data comparisons&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140#post-389788</guid>
				<title>Re: 3-d charts</title>
				<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140/online-output-questionnaire-results-iv:2011-2001-data-comparisons#post-389788</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ONS_Brendan</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>130045</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Thanks for your comments Hywel. Your point is well made and appreciated, and in future we plan to avoid any use of the 3-D stuff and keep a better balance of statistical graphical presentation vs colourful web pictures.</p> <p>The past graphs should also be replaced gradually with traditional flat versions</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140#post-388537</guid>
				<title>3-d charts</title>
				<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140/online-output-questionnaire-results-iv:2011-2001-data-comparisons#post-388537</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>HMJ</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>282642</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Sorry to make a rather negative comment with my first posting but 3-d charts are far from best statistical practice (and are one of my pet hates). Using them here does not set a good example.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140#post-375518</guid>
				<title>Re: Categorical Request</title>
				<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140/online-output-questionnaire-results-iv:2011-2001-data-comparisons#post-375518</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ONS_Brendan</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>130045</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Thanks Richard</p> <p>That extra 'don't know' option is there now - if it does not appear then just refresh the page and it should be OK.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140#post-375383</guid>
				<title>Categorical Request</title>
				<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-126140/online-output-questionnaire-results-iv:2011-2001-data-comparisons#post-375383</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Richard Price</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>255467</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>On the last question could we have an option of don't know? I can answer the other questions but at the moment I simply don't know on the last.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>