<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Use of metadata standards such as DDI</title>
		<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-124621/use-of-metadata-standards-such-as-ddi</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Use of metadata standards such as DDI&quot; - A way to bind the metadata more closely to the data could be through the use of DDI a developing standard for describing social science data.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-124621#post-369837</guid>
				<title>Use of metadata standards such as DDI</title>
				<link>http://www.ukcensusoutputs.net/forum/t-124621/use-of-metadata-standards-such-as-ddi#post-369837</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>CDU_Rob</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>255488</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>As <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Documentation_Initiative">DDI</a> can document the whole census and could record the relationship between the original questions, the concepts, the variables, the geography through to data output, it could enable the possibility of being able to provide rich content to census users, by including the definition of what the data is as part of the output and a way for the census user to explore and discover more about how the data was created.</p> <p>Any thoughts/ comments welcome</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>