|
|
The 2011 UK Census output online survey ran in the fist half of 2008. We posted some initial results in an earlier post, and this is the first is a series of themed posts covering analysis of the results in more detail.
Overall there were 529 completed and submitted responses. Here we begin to compare the responses of users from different census user communities and note the differences and similarities. Users and organisations Of users who completed the questionnaire
The largest proportion of responses, 44 per, came from users working for Local Authorities, but all other sectors of census users were represented.
User experience Users were asked how much experience they had with Census data. The results showed that
Country of interest A key part of the survey involved determining which country or countries users were interested in getting and using data from. This helped to filter user responses to questions about country specific products, areas and services. Users were asked to state which country they were interested in, with results showing that
Importance of Census data Users were asked to judge how important Census data is to their work, using a 5 point scale were 1 indicates ‘Not important at all’ and 5 indicates ‘Very important’. 82 per cent of users said that Census data was either important or very.
Online access routes
*
Media
Tabular output The most widely used 2001 census tabular products were Key Statistics (KS), Standard tables (S) and Census Area Statistics (CAS). These table types are used frequently by 64 per cent, 51 per cent and 50 per cent of users, respectively. Theme tables (T) were frequently used by 39 per cent of users and Univariate tables (UV) by 35 per cent. The pie chart below shows the most commonly used product or product family.
Users were also asked to give an indication of whether they tend to make use of the entire range of tables of a particular type or only limited sub-sets. Around half of Key Statistics users indicated they had used most of them, with the other half indicating they tend to use just a limited sub-set. Looking at the types of table that are most frequently used, (Standard and CAS), approximately half of the users tend to use most of the tables with two-thirds indicating use of only limited sub-sets. Commissioned tables The majority of users, 76 per cent had not used the commissioned table service offered by the Census offered. The biggest reason reported for this is perhaps the most suprising, with 46 per cent indicating that they didn’t know the service existed.
Other reasons reported for not using commissioned tables were that
Printed products - some thoughts and questions Next post »» «« Previous post User personas - a brief introduction See other posts similar to this one: |
Scotland’s Spring 2010 Census Consultation: Statistical Outputs, created: 1266486505|%O ago, 0 response(s) 2011 Output Consultation - Main Statistical Outputs, created: 1260870597|%O ago, 0 response(s) Autumn 2009 output consultation events, created: 1256552153|%O ago, 0 response(s) |
Online output questionnaire results I: Profiling the respondents

I really like your pie charts and graph (especially the colours used). Not sure that the bar charts need to be 3-D though!