|
|
It's around 10 weeks since we launched this second phase of the online output consultation website pilot, so now seems a good time to talk about the areas of the site that you have been viewing, and the overall level of user participation.
Anyone can view the site publicly, so we'll look at some site vistor statistics etc. In order to edit content, add comments, post in the forum, and receive email updates, you first need to register, so we'll also look at the number of people who have registered, and what user sector they represent. Site vistors A breakdown showing some summary site usage statistics is shown in Table 1, and Chart 1 shows the number of pageviews of the site by day. Table 1: Week 10 website statistics summary
Chart 1: Website pageviews by day (since site launch) Excluding the website homepage, the most popular pages - those pages most viewed - are the blog home, the wiki index page and the forum. The most popular page in the wiki section is the web dissemination sub section. So far, excluding personnel from the three Census offices, we have 54 registered users who represent either individuals or larger user groups and communities. These users represent a spread across the user community as shown in Table 2. Table 2: Registered users by user group
The online approach For the first seven weeks we ran a simple click poll on the homepage which gave users the chance to indicate their support for the inclusion of online consultation elements. The results indicated that 79 per cent of those that visited and voted preferred an online approach, and only 13 per cent preferred a traditional 'all paper' approach. This is an encouraging response to the addition of an online element in our approach to consultation, tempered perhaps by the possibility that users responding to a poll on a website may be automatically predisposed to favour an online approach in general. Blog activity Table 3 summarizes the blog posts and the level user interaction with them. Table 3: Week 10 blog post summary
So far there have been some user comments and feedback to the blog posts, but not as many as we would like to see. There may be a number of reasons that the content has not raised enough issues to stimulate user interaction, such as
There may also be other reasons, so please let us know what we can do to improve the content and presentation in ways which might encourage more user involvement. We are always happy to have suggestions for topics for future blog posts. We are also considering inviting experienced users to 'guest blog' on a topic of choice, so if you would like to be involved in this, or just suggest a topic, then please let us know. «« Previous post Questionnaire results V: Output formats - CSV See other posts similar to this one:
Add a New Comment
|
Scotland’s Spring 2010 Census Consultation: Statistical Outputs, created: 1266486505|%O ago, 0 response(s) 2011 Output Consultation - Main Statistical Outputs, created: 1260870597|%O ago, 0 response(s) Autumn 2009 output consultation events, created: 1256552153|%O ago, 0 response(s) |
The story, so far.....
